<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BodyPump 73 Sizzler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rickinoz.com/2010/02/08/bodypump-73-sizzler/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rickinoz.com/2010/02/08/bodypump-73-sizzler</link>
	<description>YABBA - Yet another bloody Brit abroad!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 03:16:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ann</title>
		<link>http://rickinoz.com/2010/02/08/bodypump-73-sizzler/comment-page-1#comment-9861</link>
		<dc:creator>Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 22:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickinoz.com/?p=939#comment-9861</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s only the back track in 72 that I get thoroughly bored with.  I&#039;m so so tired of C&amp;P followed by four sets of wide-rows.  

Overall, I think 72 is quite a tough workout if you take it heavy - the ab track is one of the hardest in a while... and the other tracks have grown on me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s only the back track in 72 that I get thoroughly bored with.  I&#8217;m so so tired of C&amp;P followed by four sets of wide-rows.  </p>
<p>Overall, I think 72 is quite a tough workout if you take it heavy &#8211; the ab track is one of the hardest in a while&#8230; and the other tracks have grown on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gepl</title>
		<link>http://rickinoz.com/2010/02/08/bodypump-73-sizzler/comment-page-1#comment-9858</link>
		<dc:creator>gepl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 10:41:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickinoz.com/?p=939#comment-9858</guid>
		<description>So which 72 track is good enough for you? Personally I did 72 only once and haven&#039;t come back for more. A really dull release, just a tad better than 68, which is still the worst ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So which 72 track is good enough for you? Personally I did 72 only once and haven&#8217;t come back for more. A really dull release, just a tad better than 68, which is still the worst ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://rickinoz.com/2010/02/08/bodypump-73-sizzler/comment-page-1#comment-9830</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 08:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickinoz.com/?p=939#comment-9830</guid>
		<description>Cant wait for another release...Yeah Yeah...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cant wait for another release&#8230;Yeah Yeah&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ingle</title>
		<link>http://rickinoz.com/2010/02/08/bodypump-73-sizzler/comment-page-1#comment-9819</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ingle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rickinoz.com/?p=939#comment-9819</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s hope it&#039;s better than BP72; apart from one track, I think 72 is one of the worst releases in recent times - mostly dull and repetitive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope it&#8217;s better than BP72; apart from one track, I think 72 is one of the worst releases in recent times &#8211; mostly dull and repetitive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

